The objective of this research is to deconstruct the discursive structures that generate symbolic violence in Islamic speculative theology (ʿilm al-kalâm), as inseparable components of their historical and political conditions, as well as their hermeneutical stakes. The central axis of this study lies in a major problematic: examining how discourse was transformed into an instrument of conflict and violence. The initial hypothesis assumes that the discourses of theologians—particularly within the sample selected for scientific purposes—were not shaped by the pursuit of neutral knowledge, but rather responded to doctrinal and political tensions. These discourses thus reproduced the sacred within discursive systems that mobilize mechanisms of differentiation and resort to interpretation in order to appropriate the shared religious ground between schools and sects, while simultaneously monopolizing religious truth. This dynamic relies on discursive strategies articulated through argumentative, narrative, and poetic devices, which operate as instruments of framing and domination, contributing to the entrenchment of exclusivist positions and to the establishment—through language—of an authority inseparable from its political conditions.